Skip to content

comparison of ease of insertion using two devices in children undergoing surgery under anaesthesia

comparison of ease of insertion using blockbuster versus proseal laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085634
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-04-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: blockbuster: ease of insertion using blockbuster in paediatric patients Control Intervention1: proseal laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion using proseal laryngeal mask airway in pa

Sponsors

Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital Faridkot
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: weight between 10-30 kg, ASA I and II scheduled to undergo surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. patients having risk of aspiration 2. patients having recent upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) in past 10 days 3. patients having restricted mouth opening or anticipated difficult airway 4. any facial, pharyngeal, laryngeal anatomy problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ease of insertionTimepoint: after induction

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. insertion time 2. number of attempts at insertion 3.Leak percentage 4.oropharyngeal leak pressure(OLP) Timepoint: 1.after induction 2.after induction 3.5 minutes after insertion 4.at the time of insertion, after pneumoperitoneum and before extubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactApurva Negi

Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital

jindalseema@ggsmch.org9646050485

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026