Skip to content

Comparision between 5 hole strut plate and 4 hole delta plate for treatment of fractures of the head of the lower jaw.

3D Strut plate versus delta plate in management of mandibular condylar fracture- a prospective randomised clinicoradiographic comparative study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085422
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-04-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D Strut Plate: Using a conventional retromandibular incision, the fracture site is exposed. The Langenbeck retractor, which is positioned at the sigmoid notch, will be used for the red

Sponsors

Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Condylar fractures with or without occlusal discrepancy. Displaced and undisplaced both types of condylar fracture. American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) I and II patient. Condylar fractures: unilateral or bilateral

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Edentulous mandible fracture. Pre-existing discrepancies in skeleton Pathological problems that were present in the temporomandibular joints before. Condylar head fracture Condylar fracture associated with any other mid-face fracture. Severely comminuted along with infected fracture. Patients who are not fit to undergo procedure under general anaesthesia. Previous history of irradiation of head and neck area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary Outcome is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of 3D strut plate with delta plate in the treatment for condylar fractures of mandible and to asses occlusal discrepancy, Maximum interincisal opening, bite force, fracture stability, restoration of ramus height and post operative complicationsTimepoint: The estimated time may range upto 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome is to assess pain, facial nerve funtion, post operative complicationsTimepoint: The estimated time may range upto 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gaurav Singh

Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences

dr.gaurav1502@gmail.com9415086536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026