Comparison of narrow jaw bone expansion by bur versus osteotome.

To evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of ridge expansion using osteotomies versus densah burs in narrow width ridge - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085397

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: ridge expansion using osteotome: use of osteotome for ridge expansion at baseline, 6 months, 1 year Control Intervention1: ridge expansion using densah burs: use of densah burs for ridg

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: systemically healthy patients single/multiple edentulous area with horizontal alveolar ridge dimensions of 3-6 mm at least 3 months of healing post extraction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients who have acute or chronic infections patients having any adverse habits like smoking, alcohol consumption pregnant or lactating women uncontrolled systemic disease allergy or hypersensitivity to any products used non-compliant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Gain in ridge width Insertion torque Implant success Crestal bone loss Bone densityTimepoint: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Surinder Sachdeva

maharishi markandeshwar college of dental sciences and research

sksperio@gmail.com8199980802

Outcome results