Skip to content

Comparing Different Injection Treatments for Skin Warts: Which Works Best?

A Comparative Study of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Various Intralesional Immunotherapies in Extragenital Cutaneous Warts - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085239
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-04-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: B079- Viral wart, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: MMR vaccine: Intralesional Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine (0.5 mL of reconstituted MMR vaccine) in extragenital cutaneous warts. Intervention2: BCG vaccine: Intralesional Bac
600,000 IU
15 mg/mL) in extragenital cutaneous warts. Control Intervention1: efficacy between Group A, Group B, group C were compared: Intralesional Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine (0.5 mL of reconstit
15 mg/mL) in extragenital cutaneous warts.

Sponsors

Dr Nimisha Kabra self
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients aged between 12 and 65 years, who presented to the dermatology outpatient department at Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, with clinically diagnosed extragenital cutaneous warts. Eligibility criteria required participants to have more than two warts and no history of wart treatment within the past four weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The study excluded pregnant or breastfeeding women, individuals with immunosuppression due to underlying diseases or medications, patients with mucosal warts, those who did not consent, individuals with severe organ dysfunction, those unable to attend monthly follow-ups, and users of alcohol or other substances

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Outcomes will be assessed in the context of resolution of warts in size and number with the help of photographic images and visual analog scale score. Timepoint: Patient assessment at every 3 weeks for maximum 5 sessions. then every month for 2 months to check for recurrence

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To note for recurrences in follow up of 2 months with adverse effects.Timepoint: Adverse effects noted at each follow up( 3 weekly), and recurrence in 2 months after complete response.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNimisha Kabra

Indira Gandhi Institute of medical sciences, Patna

nimishakabra12345@gmail.com09521584603

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026