FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparison of the Safety and Effectiveness of Using Dexmedetomidine vs. Propofol for Sedation During Elective Awake Fiber-Optic Intubation - A Randomized Control Trial

Comparison of the Safety and efficacy of sedation using Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol for elective awake-fiber optic intubation-a randomised control trial - NIl

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085100
Enrollment
54
Registered
2025-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C109- Malignant neoplasm of oropharynx,unspecified Health Condition 2: C020- Malignant neoplasm of dorsal surface of tongue

Interventions

Intervention1: Awake Fiber optic bronchoscopy: Sedation for Awake Fiber optic intubation with Propofol for Difficult airway patient Intervention2: Awake Fibre optic bronchoscopy: Awake Fibre optic int

Sponsors

Narayana Health Narayana hrudayalaya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I, ASA II and ASA III patients 18 to 65 years planned for elective fiber optic intubation in head and neck surgeries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal Pregnancy Known cardiac disease including heart block/on beta blocker. Intracranial pathology and cerebrovascular disease Known Hypersensitivity to Dexmedetomidine/Propofol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Haemodynamically stability b/w two groupsTimepoint: 8weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety & efficacy During fibre optic intubationTimepoint: 8weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVigneshwaran

Narayana Health City

drmaama@yahoo.com9449000426

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026