Skip to content

Comparison of two treatment options for pimple marks

Randomised double blinded study comparing efficacy of microneedling radiofrequency and fractional carbondioxide laser for acne scars - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/085049
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-04-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L905- Scar conditions and fibrosis of skin

Interventions

Intervention1: MNRF: Microneedling radiofrequency Three sequential sessions at four weeks interval Control Intervention1: Fractional CO2: Fractional CO2 Three sequential sessions at four weeks interva

Sponsors

Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with acne scars (all grades), above 18 years who are willing to participate the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy & lactation, keloidal tendency, active inflammatory lesions in face, herpes infection, bleeding disorders, undergone any skin resurfacing techniques in 12 months and on retinoids

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Depth and visibility of Acne scars will be reducedTimepoint: 5 months

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Micro Needling Radio Frequency(MNRF) is more efficacious in treatment of acne scarsTimepoint: 5 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Trishna vaishali M

Pondicherry Institute of Medical sciences

trishpraveen@gmail.com9840579316

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026