A study to compare how fast teeth move with two minor surgical methods in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment"

Comparative evaluation of the difference in the rate of orthodontic tooth movement between micro-osteoperforations and piezocision -a split mouth randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/085042

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezocision: Piezocision will be conducted on 15 patients measuring canine retraction monthly for 4 months Control Intervention1: Micro-osteoperforations: Micro-osteoperforation will be

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i. Patients between 18 to 30 years of age. ii. Patients requiring bilateral upper premolar extraction treated with pre-adjusted edgewise bracket system using 0.022 MBT bracket system only. iii. After alignment and levelling phase in the upper arch and placemnt of 0.019x0.025 SS archwire for 1 month. iv. After leveling the curve of spee in the upper arch. v. Minimum of 5 mm extraction space between canine and second premolar bilaterally. vi. Individual canine retraction using mini-screw with a closed coil spring. vii. Good oral hygiene and periodontal condition. viii. All the patients showing normodivergent growth pattern.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. Medically compromised patients. ii. Chronic use of medications i.e. anti-inflammatory drugs. iii. Poor oral hygiene as determined by OHI. iv. Evidence of bone loss. v. History of orthodontic treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate and compare the difference in the rate of orthodontic tooth movement between micro-osteoperforations and piezocision.Timepoint: 2 years 5 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
comparison of rate of orthodontic tooth movement between Piezocision and micro-osteoperforationTimepoint: 2 years 5 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Swaraj Dumbre

SMBT Dental College And Hospital, sangmner

hrushiapahle@gmail.com8806807124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026