FindTrial
Sign In

Enzymatic Changes of Fluid in the Gingiva During Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement Following Small Controlled Perforations in the Bone Combined with Electric Toothbrush Use: A Comparative Study to assess increased or decreased tooth movement in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment

Enzymatic Evaluation of Gingival Crevicular Fluid During Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement Following Micro-Osteoperforation Combined with Electric Toothbrush Use: A Comparative Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084981
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-04-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro-Osteoperforation and use of Electric Toothbrush.: Micro-Osteoperforation spaced 1 3 mm apart distal to the canine will be created. These will be placed on both the buccal and pala

Sponsors

Dr Arjun K V
Lead Sponsor
Professor Dr MS Ravi
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient belonging to the age group of 18-24 years Patients requiring extraction of the bilateral maxillary first premolar and distalization of the canine Overall good health with no systemic conditions No history of prior orthodontic treatment Maintains good oral hygiene Probing depth less than 3 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with underlying medical conditions Individuals on medications that affect bone metabolism Presence of bone pathology Ankylosis of the tooth Non-compliant patients Poor oral hygiene or inadequate oral care Fracture of the cortical plate during extraction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The combined procedure of micro-osteoperforation and the use of electric toothbrush results in a significantly increased rate of orthodontic tooth movement with minimal adverse dentoalveolar effects compared to that of the conventional methods.Timepoint: The initial sample will be obtained from both sides of the canine region before retraction (T0). Subsequent samples will be collected on day 1 (T1), day 7 (T2), day 14 (T3), day 30 (T4), day 60 (T5) after the start of canine retraction.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The overall time for orthodontic treatment will be reduced.Timepoint: 24 Months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr MS Ravi

A B SHETTY MEMORIAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, MANGALORE

drmcqueenmendonca@nitte.edu.in9880705146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026