Comparison of Braces Types on Arch Size and Front Tooth Angle in Patients with Moderate Lower Front Teeth Crowdin

Comparative assessment of arch dimension and incisor inclination by using self-ligating bracket system with conventional bracket system in patients having moderate mandibular anterior crowding A Randomized clinical trial. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084926

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: self ligating system: 20 patients with self ligating bracket system measuring the intercanine , interpremolar and intermolar width after alignment and levelling Control Intervention1: c

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients age between 20 to 30 years 2. Moderate (4-6mm) mandibular crowding 3. Non-extraction treatment in mandibular arch

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Missing canine, premolar, molar in mandibular arch 2 Crowding of less than 4 mm (mild) and more than 6 mm (severe) in mandibular arch 3 History of previous orthodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
changes seen in the arch dimension (intercanine,interpremolar,intermolar width) and incisor imclination changesTimepoint: changes seen in the arch dimension (intercanine,interpremolar,intermolar width) and incisor imclination changes 0 months and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
INCISOR INLCINATIONTimepoint: 2 years	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kishnakant Wakte

SMBT Dental College And Hospital, sangmner

drnagmode77@gmail.com9511207586

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026