Skip to content

Clinical and radiographic Comparison of delayed and immediate implants: a clinicoradiographic study

Comparative evaluation of marginal bone loss and width of keratinized tissue in immediate vs delayed, platform matching implants placed subcrestally - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084828
Enrollment
22
Registered
2025-04-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Immediate implant: Measuring marginal bone loss and width of keratinized tissue in immediate implant Control Intervention1: Delayed implant: Measuring marginal bone loss and width of ke

Sponsors

Harleen Jolly
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Age more than 18 years 2 Both males and females were included 3 Systemically healthy cooperative patients 4 Patients requiring implants either 3 months or more after extraction or immediately after extraction 5 Full mouth plaque score and full mouth bleeding score more than 30 percent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patients having any adverse habits like smoking or alcohol consumption. 2 Pregnant or lactating women. 3 Uncontrolled systemic disease. 4 Allergy or hypersensitivity to any product used. 5 Mental or physical disorder. 6 Medications interfering with bone metabolism.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
comparing marginal bone level and keratinized mucosa width in delayed and immediate implantTimepoint: Baseline and at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Surinder Sachdeva

Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University)

sksperio@gmail.com8199980802

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026