Comparison between the working performance of two Supraglottic airway devices I-gel and LMA Supreme among patients posted for elective surgeries undergoing general anesthesia.

To evaluate the working performance of two supraglottic airway devices I-gel and LMA Supreme among patients posted for elective surgeries undergoing general anesthesia. - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084792

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA Supreme: Evaluation of working performance of two supraglottic airway device I-gel and LMA supreme among the patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia Control

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients age 18 to 60 years 2) ASA (American society of anesthesiologist s) grade I, II, III 3) Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia 4) BMI less than 30kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with difficult airway and Mallampati Grade III and IV 2) Patients with history of supraglottic growth 3) Duration of surgery longer than 2 hours 4) Patients with known case of respiratory illness (like COPD , asthma, bronchitis etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To assess following parameters in both the groups 1) working performance in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, EtCO2 and Mean tidal expiration volume 2)insertion characteristics in terms of insertion time, number of attempts, manipulations required during insertion and failed insertion if any. Timepoint: Hemodynamic parameters 1)Before insertion 2) After 1min 3)after 5min 4)after 10min 5)after extubation	—

Measure

Time frame

To assess following parameters in both the groups 1) working performance in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure, EtCO2 and Mean tidal expiration volume 2)insertion characteristics in terms of insertion time, number of attempts, manipulations required during insertion and failed insertion if any. Timepoint: Hemodynamic parameters 1)Before insertion 2) After 1min 3)after 5min 4)after 10min 5)after extubation

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess the following parameters in both the groups 1) Ease of insertion of orogastric tube through SGA devices. 2) Perioperative hemodynamic response of the patient in terms of pulse rate & mean atrial pressure. 3) Side effects & Complications if any (blood stained device, sore throat & laryngo-bronchospasm) Timepoint: 15 Months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chandrika Bhut

Sir Takhtasinhji general hospital bhavnagaqr

dr.chandrika62@gmail.com09427040221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026