A comparative study of micropulse yellow laser and conventional grid laser in the treatment of diabetic macular edema

A comparative study of micropulse yellow laser and conventional grid laser in the treatment of diabetic macular edema a randomised control study - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084752

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H358- Other specified retinal disorders

Interventions

Intervention1: Laser: Resolves macular edema Total duration:6 months Control Intervention1: Laser: Comparative study between conventional grid laser and micropulse yellow laser Total duration:6 month

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more then 18years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Planned PRP within 6 months 2) Previous retinal treatment: laser or surgery 3) Uncontrolled hypertension, renal failure 4)Planned intraocular surgery within 6 months 5) Patients with sensory retinal detachment 6) Patients with gross CME/VMT

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1) Mean change in BCVA in the study population treated with micropulse yellow laser and study population treated with conventional grid laser at 1month,3 months and 6 months after treatment. 2) Mean changes in OCT parameters,CMT, in the study population treated with micropulse yellow laser and Conventional grid laserTimepoint: At 1 week,3 months and 6months after intervention	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrShashidhar swamy

Banglore medical college and research institute banglore

swamyshashidhar@gmail.com9845779330

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026