Skip to content

Comparison of intense pulsed light therapy(IPL) versus Intense regulated pulsed light(IRPL) in treating dry eye

A Comparative Analysis of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Versus Intense Regulated Pulsed Light (IRPL) in the treatment of moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction - IPL vs IRPL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084735
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-04-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H028- Other specified disorders of eyelid

Interventions

Intervention1: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Versus Intense Regulated Pulsed Light (IRPL): The study participants will be divided into two groups group 1 will undergo Standard IPL (M22 by Lumenis, Yokn

Sponsors

Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed with moderate to severe meibomian gland dysfunction based on clinical examination. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score more than 20. Tear breakup time (TBUT) less than 10 seconds. Fitzpatrick skin type scale Willingness to provide informed consent and adhere to study protocols.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of ocular surgery or trauma within the past six months. Active ocular infection or inflammation unrelated to DED. Use of contact lenses within two weeks prior to baseline assessment. Pregnancy or lactation. Known hypersensitivity to light-based therapies. Concurrent systemic conditions or medications that could interfere with the study outcomes, such as autoimmune diseases or retinoid use Having received any other prior treatment for dry eye disease in the form of medication or procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the clinical efficacy of IPL and IRPL in improving tear film stability and meibomian gland function and assess patient satisfaction and quality of life following treatment with IPL and IRPL.Timepoint: day1,15,45 and day 85

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrFaiza Syed Jafar

Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital

faiza_jafar@yahoo.com8197626737

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026