Stability of gum margin following placement of bone powder mixed with participants blood protein in treatment of gum disease individuals.

Effect Of Supracrestal Grafting On Post-Surgical Recession in Periodontal pocket management - A Randomized controlled trial - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084640

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Test Group (Flap Surgery and Supracrestal Grafting): Under local anesthesia, an oblique incision is to be made across the papilla starting from the gingival margin at the line angle of

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Systemically healthy subjects 2. Age ranged between 20 to 65 years 3. Stage III periodontitis (case definition by EFP-AAP periodontal destruction in maxilla or mandible excluding molars 5. Probing pocket depth greater than or equal to 5 mm either with horizontal pattern of bone destruction 6. Patients exhibiting satisfactory oral hygiene at the time of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Sites with pseudo pockets 2. Teeth with advanced mobility (grade III Miller mobility Index) 3. Sites with prosthetic restorations or incomplete endodontic therapy 4. Patients who are smokers 5. Pregnant and lactating women 6. Patients with glycemic status and HbA1c greater than or equal to 7 percentage 7. Patients with known platelet disorders or using any medication that are known to interfere with platelet function 8. Patients with other systemic conditions or diseases influencing the course of periodontal disease and therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To assess and compare the changes in the Gingival Marginal Level within the test group. To compare the changes in Gingival Marginal Level (GML) between test and control groupTimepoint: Baseline 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess and compare the changes in the interdental papillary height within the test groups To compare the changes in interdental papillary height between test and control groups To compare the changes in probing pocket depth between the test and control groups To compare the changes in Clinical attachment level between the test and control groupsTimepoint: Baseline 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anupama Tadepalli

SRM Dental College

anupamamds@gmail.com9677065517

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026