FindTrial
Sign In

How well does the P.E.A.C.E and L.O.V.E method help with ankle sprain in sports players

Feasibility And Efficiency of P.E.A.C.E and L.O.V.E Protocol Among Contact Sport Players With Acute Ankle Sprain - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084634
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M708- Other soft tissue disorders related to use, overuse and pressure

Interventions

Intervention1: P.E.A.C.E and L.O.V.E protocol: PROTECTION to Maintain proper positioning to prevent further injury and complications ELEVATION to 10 -18 Inch elevation to minimise swelling AVOID ANTI

Sponsors

Vikram I
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participant with a Pain score 5 and below in Visual Analog scale(after 24 hours of injury),Contact sport players,Grade 1 & 2 acute ankle sprain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fractures and dislocation,Open wounds,Subjects not willing to participate,Grade 3 ankle sprain,Chronic ankle instabilities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analog scale, Goniometer,Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)Timepoint: 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Psychological Readiness to return to sports scale (P-IRRS) , Time of Recovery, Activity Log TrackingTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr M Manikumar

SRM Institute of Science and technology

manikumm@srmist.edu.in8939164922

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026