Skip to content

Comparing Two Types of Radiation Therapy for Nasal Cancer

A Prospective, Phase II, Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) versus Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084548
Enrollment
240
Registered
2025-04-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C119- Malignant neoplasm of nasopharynx,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: IMPT is a sophisticated type of proton therapy used in cancer treatment, similar to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). It allows for preci

Sponsors

Tata Memorial Centre Research Administration Council
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed NPC: squamous, undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma 2.Age more than or equal to 18 years 3.Stage II-IVA NPC (as per the 8th AJCC staging) 4.Planned for treatment with curative intent 5.Willing to undergo treatment at TMC Proton Therapy Centre 6.Willing to give informed consent 7.Patients who have received standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy outside/TMH and have a baseline pre-treatment imaging and staging information available

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with oligometastatic or metastatic disease 2.Other nasopharyngeal histopathologies like sarcomas, adenocarcinoma, lymphoma etc. 3.Significant comorbidities precluding combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy 4.Patients with synchronous or metachronous primary 5.Patients who have received prior RT to the head and neck region 6.Patients with pre-existing significant salivary gland pathology 7.Incompletely or partially treated NPC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)Timepoint: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess patient reported xerostomia and hearing loss post treatment in both the arms Timepoint: baseline, RT conclusion, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post RT completion;Objective evaluation of xerostomia using salivary scintigraphy post RT in both the armsTimepoint: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post RT completion;Comparison of other radiation-related acute- and late-toxicities in both the arms Timepoint: evaluated on treatment, at conclusion, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post RT completion;To assess Quality of Life (QoL) in both the armsTimepoint: baseline, at RT conclusion, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post RT completion.;To assess the cost effectiveness of IMPT over IMRTTimepoint: baseline, at RT conclusion, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post RT completion.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sarbani Ghosh Laskar

Tata Memorial Hospital

sarbanilaskar@gmail.com9820834386

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026