Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Placement of two flowable resin based composite with and without retentive slots in non-carious cervical lesions of the teeth.: Evaluation of two flowable resin based composite in non-c
Sponsors
JSS AHER grants
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Must be above 18 years. 2. Must be given written consent to participate in the trail. 3. Must be in good general health. 4. Must be available for the required post-operative follow-up visits. 5. Must have a minimum of 4 cervical lesions in need of restoration. 6. Cervical lesions must provide for a minimum of 1mm thickness of restorative material while maintaining natural tooth contour. 7. Participants with the score of 3 of Tooth Wear Index by Smith and Knight will be selected
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Systemic or local disorders that contraindicate the dental procedures. 2. Evidence of xerostomia, severe bruxing or clenching or in need of TMJ related therapy. 3. Pregnant (self-reported) and lactating women. 4. Known allergy to dental materials. 5. Any oral soft tissue lesions 6. Are unwilling or unable to have dental radiographs or photographs taken of their dentition or soft tissues 7. Condition affecting salivary flow (e.g., salivary gland disorder, Sjögren’s Syndrome) 8. Any other condition which in the view of the investigator may affect the ability of a subject to complete the study 9. Teeth with periapical pathology or exhibiting symptoms of pulpal pathology and teeth that have been pulp capped 10. Non-vital and root canal treated teeth. 11. Teeth with near pulpal exposures on pre-operative radiographs 12. Hypersensitive teeth 13. Teeth with a periodontal pocket of more than 4mm with bleeding on probing 14. Teeth that are used as abutments for any prosthesis.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare and evaluate the treatment outcome between flowable Giomer and Nanohybrid composite resin using modified Hickel criteria.Timepoint: 18 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare and evaluate the outcome between flowable Giomer (with retentive slot), (without retentive slot) and Nanohybrid composite resin (with retentive slot), (without retentive slot)Timepoint: 18 months | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Annapoorna BM
JSS Dental College and Hospital, Mysuru
Outcome results
None listed