Skip to content

to find out the effectiveness of mobile app follow up versus In-person follow up in rehabilitation of periarthritis of shoulder joint

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Conventional versus Mobile based Application in Follow up and Rehabilitation of Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder joint - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084302
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M750- Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder

Interventions

Intervention1: Mobile Application "DEFREEZE SHOULDER": Patients diagnosed to have Peri-Arthritis of shoulder will use the mobile application "DEFREEZE SHOULDER" as part of their follow-up and rehabili

Sponsors

Naveen Karthik
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Confirmed Adhesive Capsulitis: Only participants with a clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint were included. 2. Age Range: Participants were required to be 60 years of age or older. 3. Functional Status: Eligible participants maintained a baseline level of functional mobility and independence as evaluated by their healthcare provider. 4. Cognitive Abilities: Participants had to demonstrate the cognitive ability to understand and adhere to the rehabilitation instructions. 5. Informed Consent: All participants provided informed consent to partake in the rehabilitation program and associated research activities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous Shoulder Surgery: Individuals who had undergone previous surgical interventions on the affected shoulder were excluded. 2. Severe Comorbidities: Those with severe comorbid conditions that could interfere with rehabilitation or pose a risk during the study were not eligible. 3. Significant Shoulder Pathology: Patients with major shoulder pathologies or injuries such as rotator cuff tears that could affect rehabilitation outcomes were excluded. 4. History of Adverse Reactions: Participants with a history of adverse reactions to rehabilitation interventions were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Enhanced functional recovery, including improvements in shoulder function, range of motion, strength, and mobility, as measured by validated clinical scales over the study period.Timepoint: Enhanced functional recovery, including improvements in shoulder function, range of motion, strength, and mobility, as measured at baseline,2nd,4th,6th,8th,10th,12th,24th week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Improved rehabilitation adherence rates assessed through engagement metrics in the mobile application. Increased patient satisfaction evaluated via standardized satisfaction surveys. Reduction in healthcare utilization, including fewer in-person visits and lower medical costs.Timepoint: at 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNitesh Kumar Rathi

Saveetha medical college and hospital.

niteshrathi73@gmail.com9840136713

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026