Skip to content

Comparison of two methods of mask holding in patients undergoing general anesthesia

Comparison of two-handed C-E technique and V-E technique for mask ventilation in unconscious apnoeic adults with simulated C-spine immobilization: A randomized crossover study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084265
Enrollment
86
Registered
2025-04-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: TECHNIQUE OF MASK HOLDING: Two handed C-E technique of mask ventilation is done for 2 min while induction of general anesthesia Control Intervention1: TECHNIQUE OF MASK HOLDING: Two han

Sponsors

DR SUSHMA H
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients posted for surgery under general anesthesia 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists -physical status (ASA-PS) grade 1 to 3 patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with anticipated difficult airway 2.Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean expired tidal volume as measured by the anesthetic machine flow sensorTimepoint: Mean expired tidal volume as measured by the anesthetic machine flow sensor over 1 min of mask ventilation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean expired tidal volume per predicted body weight and incidence of audible leakTimepoint: Over 2 min of mask ventilation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SUSHMA H

KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE,MANIPAL

sushmahaithal237@gmail.com09483305224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026