COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OFTWO DIFFERENT GRAFT MATERIALS IN EXTRACTION SOCKET PRESERVATION:A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF XENOGRAFTS AND ALLOPLASTS IN EXTRACTION SOCKET PRESERVATION: A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084233

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: ALLOPLAST(PERIOGLAS) AND XENOGRAFT(BIO OSS): XENOGRAFT(BIO OSS) duration-6 months Control Intervention1: ALLOPLASTS(PERIOGLAS): ALLOPLASTS(PERIOGLAS) duration-6 months

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of the age group greater than 20 years of either gender Systemicaaly healthy Patients with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene Patients willing for voluntary participation and have signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: TOOTH WITH ACUTE INFECTIONS OR CYSTS PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF RADIATION OR CHEMOTHERAPY PATIENTS WITH BLEEDING DISORDERS SYSTEMIC USE OF STEROIDS PREGNANT OR LACTATING WOMEN SMOKERS

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
hard and soft tissue changesTimepoint: 6 months from baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
soft tissue dimensional changesTimepoint: 6 month from baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PRIYA S

SRI RAMAKRISHNA DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL, COIMBATORE

22mds10@srdch.ac.in09791524402

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026