Skip to content

Comparing Immediate vs. Delayed Dentin Sealing on Indirect Restoration Performance: An In Vivo Study with Two Restorative Materials

Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) versus Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS) on the performance of Indirect restoration using two different restorative materials: An In Vivo Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084177
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-04-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Indirect Restorations: Minimally invasive preparations done to receive Indirect Lithium disilicate restoration or Indirect Composite Restoration followed by reinforced IDS using Clearfi

Sponsors

Government Dental College and hospital Ahmedabad
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Patient aged between 16-55 years 2)Patient with healthy pulp in complex cavities 3)Maxillary and mandibular 1st molars with large class I & II defects: wide facio-lingually/ require cusp coverage 4)Patient should not be medically compromised or mentally challenged

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients who are medically compromised or Pregnant 2)Active periodontal disease 3)Signs and symptoms of Irreversible pulpitis or pulpal necrosis 4)Patients having bruxism, parafunctional habits or TMJ disorders 5)Very deep subgingival margins

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Inter-operative and post-cementation hypersensitivity problem after indirect restorations could be solved by using the immediate dentin sealing protocol using a self-etch adhesive. Timepoint: The outcome will be assessed immediately after tooth preparation, inter operative, post cementation (after 1 week), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The use of IDS could reduce bacterial leakage, increase in bond strength of the restoration thereby increasing survival rates of the restoration.Timepoint: Evaluation of Restorations by modified USPHS criteria at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shikha Kanodia

Government Dental College and Hospital, Ahmedabad

shikhakk@yahoo.co.in9825465861

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026