Skip to content

A Retrospective Study on Comparing Different Cervical Cancer Screening Methods and Factors Linked to HPV Infection in a Tertiary Cancer Clinic

A retrospective study audit for the comparative performance evaluation of Cervical Cancer screening methods of Visual Inspection with Acetic acid, Cervical Cytology, HPV DNA testing and Determinants of HPV Infection for detecting Cervical precancer/ cancers in a Tertiary Cancer Screening Clinic - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084075
Enrollment
26400
Registered
2025-04-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women aged 18 years above Women who Underwent cervical cancer screening by VIA, cytology and HPV DNA test Women Underwent diagnostic evaluation by Colposcopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Inadequate data despite the attempt will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Prevalence and Determinants Of HPV infection & CIN: a. proportion of screened women testing positive for HPV infection. b. Prevalence of different grades of cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3) c. Association of Socio-demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors with HPV infection and CIN. 2. HPV Genotype Distribution and Association with Cervical Lesions: a. Frequency of different HPV genotypes detected. b. association of specific high-risk HPV genotypes with histologically confirmed precancerous (CIN2/3) and cancerous lesions. 3. Association Between HPV infection and cytological abnormalities: a. Proportion of HPV-positive women with abnormal cytology results. b. association between HPV genotype and cytological abnormalities such as ASCUS,LSIL and HSIL Timepoint: 12 Months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Comparison of Cervical Cancer Screening Methods & Diagnostic Accuracy: a)Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of different screening methods (VIA, HPV testing, Pap smear, Colposcopy). b)Agreement between different screening modalities and histopathological findings. 2.Performance of Colposcopy in VIA & HPV-Based Screening Services: a) Diagnostic accuracy of Colposcopy in detecting cervical precancerous/cancerous lesions. b) Agreement between Colposcopic findings and histopathological findings. Timepoint: 12 Months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sharmila Pimple

Tata Memorial Hospital

pimplesharmila@gmail.com9223207939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026