Comparison of two types of orthodontic mini implants

Comparative evaluation of silver dioxide coated stainless steel orthodontic mini implants for its anti-bacterial and anti-adherent properties with that of non-coated orthodontic mini-implants a randomized control trial - NIl

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/084074

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-03

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: orthodontic mini implants coated with photocatalytic Ago2 thin film: orthodontic Mini-implants will be evaluated for bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Time Points 1 week, 1 mont

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients requiring orthodontic mini-implants for anchorage purposes. 2.Age between 13-30 years. 3.Good oral hygiene and absence of periodontal disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.pregnancy 2.Patients on long-term antibiotic therapy 3.Smokers 4.Presence of active oral infections

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Reduction in bacterial colonization on the implant surface.Timepoint: assessment will be done at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Reduced biofilm adherence on the implant surfaceTimepoint: assessment will be done at 3 to 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rizwan Gilani

Datta Meghe Institue of Higher Education And Research

drrizwangilani@gmail.com9923986732

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026