Skip to content

TO COMPARE BETWEEN 2 MM LOCKING MINIPLATES VERSUS 2.5 MM LOCKING MINIPLATE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOWER FRONT REGION FRACTURE TO FIND BETTER

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF 2 MM LOCKING MINIPLATES VERSUS 2.5 MM LOCKING MINIPLATE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ANTERIOR MANDIBULAR FRACTURE - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084055
Enrollment
26
Registered
2025-04-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M265- Dentofacial functional abnormalities

Interventions

Intervention1: 2 mm locking miniplates 4 hole and 6 hole with gap: a vestibular incision is given and fracture site is exposed followed by reduction of fracture by using 2mm 4 hole with gap locking mi

Sponsors

SARDAR PATEL POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Group I & II patients having isolated anterior mandibular fractures Age 18 years - 50 years Patient willing to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Edentulous Patients Patients with multiple mandibular fractures and/or with any additional midface fractures Medically compromised patients Patients not willing for surgery Patients not fit to undergo procedure under general anaesthesia. Previous history of irradiation of head and neck area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The study will evaluate intra-operative time, post operative pain(according to VAS4), bite force, fracture stability, occlusion, infection, paresthesia of mental nerve and radiological evaluation will include fracture stability, plate fracture and post operatively malunion, delayed union and non union. Timepoint: 1ST POST OPERATIVE DAY, 7TH POST OPERATIVE DAY, 14T POST POST OPERATIVE DAY, 1ONTH, 3 MONNTHS AND 6 MONTHS

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy of the plates & the better anatomical reductionTimepoint: 1ST DAY, 3RD DAY, 7TH DAY, 14TH DAY, 1 MONTH, 3 MONTHS AND 6 MONTHS

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SHUBAMOY MONDAL

SARDAR PATEL POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL AND EDICAL SCIENCES

dr.shubhamoy@gmail.com7800899044

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026