Skip to content

Comparing diffrent types of tooth fillings for cavities in childrens black teeth: A research study

Comparative Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Modified, Glass Hybrid and Conventional GIC in Class II Restorations of Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/084049
Enrollment
105
Registered
2025-04-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K02- Dental caries Health Condition 2: K02- Dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: ACTIVA BIOACTIVE: ACTIVA BioACTIVE is an innovative dental restorative material developed by Pulpdent Corporation, combining the advantages of resin composites and glass ionomer cements

Sponsors

Self sponsored
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Occluso-proximal cavities in the primary maxillary and mandibular molars, International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) codes 4 and 5 2. Asymptomatic, vital teeth without pulpal involvement. 3. Patient without systemic diseases that may interfere with dental treatment. 4. Teeth without any developmental defects such as hypomineralisation, hypoplasia, and fluorosis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Primary molars with extensive loss of tooth structure that exceeds the suitability for a Class II restoration. 2. Teeth with periodontal or periapical pathology. 3. Patients with a history of adverse reactions to restorative dental materials. 4. Severe developmental or cognitive impairment that interferes with cooperation during dental procedure. 5. Inability of the patient to comply with the follow-up examinations and the requirements of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the clinical efficacy of ACTIVA BioACTIVE, Equia forte(glass hybrid) and conventional GIC in restoring class II carious lesions in primary molars.Timepoint: 1,6 and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare three materials in terms of Esthetic, Biological and Functional properties.Timepoint: 1, 6 and 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMayuri Sopan Mundhe

King Georges Medical University

rajeevkumarsingh@kgmcindia.edu9450849528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026