Skip to content

comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency of two different block technique in pediatric dental patients

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency of Direct Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique Versus Fischer 123 Technique in Pediatric Dental Patients: A split mouth randomised controlled trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/083992
Enrollment
62
Registered
2025-04-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K049- Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures Health Condition 3: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: fischer 123 injection technique: 1 minute, 2.5ml of lignocaine related to inferior alveolar nerve block Control Intervention1: direct inferior alveolar nerve block: 1 minute, 2.5ml of l

Sponsors

Harsh Sanjaykumar Baldawa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 7-11 years mandibular molars advised for extraction ASA I or II (healthy or mild systemic disease) Written parental consent and child assent Moderate anxiety and ability to follow instructions Not on medications interfering with anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: grade 3 mobile teeth Childre with severe anxiety or uncooperative behavior requiring sedation or general anesthesia. Children with prior adverse reactions to dental local anesthesia techniques. Presence of acute orofacial infections or abscesses in the treatment area. Children with significant developmental delays or neurological conditions affecting cooperation or pain perception. Patients on medications interfering with local anesthesia efficacy or safety (e.g., anticoagulants, certain antidepressants).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
pain perceptionTimepoint: Baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
AnxietyTimepoint: baseline

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHarsh Sanjaykumar Baldawa

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, SIMATS University

dineshkumarb.sdc@gmail.com8485841420

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026