"Comparing Two Methods of Dental Implant Placement in the Front of the Upper Jaw: A Study on Socket Shields vs. Traditional Immediate Implants"

socket shield technique versus conventional immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary region-A randomised prospective comparative study - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/04/083947

Enrollment

Registered

2025-04-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: socket shield technique: patients tooth extraction will be done by socket shield technique with the sequential use of burs. In the first step tooth crown will be sectioned at the cervic

for implant mobility, periimplantitis on 4th and 6th month, for implant stability at the time of implant placement and 6th month

for radiographic evaluation of buccal crestal bone height at pre-operative, immediate post operative ,4th month and 7th month. Control Intervention1: conventional immediate implant placement: patients

for radiographic evaluation of buccal crestal bone height at pre-operative, immediate post operative ,4th month and 7th month.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) I and II patient. 1. Patients under Sagital Root Position classification (SRP) class I and class II 2. Patients with fractured maxillary anteriors without fractured cortical plates or any associated pathology 3.Patients age between 18-40 years 4.Good oral hygiene 5.Adequate bone volume for implant placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
primary outcome is to evaluate Mobility (Misch s Clinical implant stability),Implant Primary and secondary stability (Osstell),Measurement of the amount of vertical and horizontal bone loss as seen on CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography).Timepoint: estimated time may range upto 7 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
secondary outcome is to evaluate pain,wound healing,paillary index and periimplantitisTimepoint: estimated time may range upto 7months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Madan Mishra

Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences

mm.15mds@gmail.com9565740127

Outcome results