Skip to content

A STUDY TO COMPARE TWO SEALERS USED IN ROOT CANAL TREATMENT

COMPARISON OF BIO CERAMIC AND RESIN BASED SEALERS ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOME FOLLOWING SINGLE VISIT ROOT CANAL TREATMENT OF MOLAR WITH APICAL PERIODONTITIS: A RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/083911
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-04-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M95-M95- Other disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue Health Condition 2: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: bioceramic sealers: composition: Tricalcium Silicate dicalcium silicate tricalcium aluminate zirconium dioxide thickening agent already marketed showing excellent biocompactibility, a

Sponsors

VIBIN V K
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with apical periodontitis in relation to molar teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients with acute severe symptoms and teeth having developmental defect or any anomaly

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
post operative pain radiographic healing Timepoint: post operative pain visual analogue scale less than at the time of treatment radiographic healing, periapical index scoring less than at the time of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
tender on percusion sinus discharge intraoral or extra oral sweelingTimepoint: tender on purcusion present or not sinus discharge present or absent swelling present or absent all are checked after 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrElsy P Simon

KMCT DENTAL COLLEGE

vkvibin87@gmail.com7012020779

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026