Skip to content

Comparing Manual versus Mobile App-Based Data Collection for Assessing Recovery in Patients with Severe Leg Bone Infections Treated with Ilizarov Fixation

Evaluation of Effectiveness between Manual data collection and mobile Application Based Data Collection for Infective non-union of long bone of Lower Limb Managed with Ilizarov Ring Fixation Using ASAMI Scoring System - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/083828
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-04-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M848- Other disorders of continuity of bone

Interventions

Intervention1: ORTHOSYNC: Patients undergoing ilizarov ring fixatation for infective non union of femur and tibia will use the mobile application called ORTHOSYNC part of their post operative protocol

Sponsors

Obli Prakash P.C
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of surgicalable age who have extra-articular tibial or femoral infective non-union and who consent to treatment and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome is to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of data collection for functional and radiological outcomes in patients with infective non-union of long bones treated with Ilizarov ring fixation. The study will compare mobile app-based data collection with the manual method using ASAMI scoring to assess data entry time, accuracy, and completeness, aiming to improve efficiency and reduce errors.Timepoint: The assessments will be conducted at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary outcomes include several aspects. First, patient outcomes will be compared between the two groups based on functional recovery & radiological healing, assessed using the ASAMI scoring system over the 6-month study period. Second, user satisfaction among healthcare professionals regarding the ease of use & effectiveness of the mobile application versus manual methods will be assessed through a Likert scale-based feedback questionnaire at the end of the study. Third, data management metrics such as the time taken for data entry, retrieval, & analysis will be compared between the two methods using recorded time logs. Finally, the completeness of datasets & error rates in data collection will be evaluated by auditing both methods for missing or incorrect entries at the end of the study. These outcomes will provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness & feasibility of mobile application-based data collection in clinical research.Timepoint: 1 month,3 month,6 month,1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactYeshwanth S

Saveetha medical college and hospital

djyesh@rediffmail.com9840092819

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026