FindTrial
Sign In

Study is to compare two airway devices in post burn patients comparing mainly the time it takes for successful insertion of the airway devices in the patient undergoing general anaesthesia

Clinical utility of laryngeal mask airway Blockbuster and Supreme Supraglottic devices for Airway management in post burn injury contracture neck patients under general anaesthesia: A Randomized comparative study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/083827
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-04-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S109- Superficial injury of unspecifiedpart of neck

Interventions

Intervention1: 2nd generation SUPRAGLOTTIC DEVICE: LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY BLOCKBUSTER is a new airway device which is used to secure airway of the patient undergoing general Anaesthesia Intervention2:

Sponsors

King George medical university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA GRADE1&2 BMI-18 to 30kg/m2 Inter incisor distance more than equal to 2.5cm With schedule contracture release within 6 months Modified onah classification 1&2 criteria met

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal Any intro oral pathology Reactive airway disease Severe neck contracture- modified onah classification 3 Neck circumference more than 40cm Increased risk of gastric aspiration Uncontrolled hypertension/Diabetes Previous history of stroke or any neuropsychiatric medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for successful insertion of LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY devices Measured from the time the device was picked up until visible square capnograph appeared on the monitorTimepoint: 1.5 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of insertion On subjective scale of 1 to 4 1- No resistance 2- mild to moderate resistance 3- severe resistance 4- inability to insert the deviceTimepoint: 1.5 years;Oropharyngeal leak pressure Fifteen minutes after insertion of device, oropharyngeal leak pressure will be recorded by closing expiratory valve of breathing circuit at a fixed gas flow 3liter/min and noting airway pressure in the manometerTimepoint: 1.5 years;Complications after removal of device Nausea Oral bleeding Sore throatTimepoint: 1.5 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Govind Agarwal

King George medical university, Lucknow

govind.sd.50@gmail.com9439019171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026