FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of effects between two comparison groups planned to undergo replacement of knee joint based on post operative pain and early rehabilitation one group receiving epidural analgesia and intervention group receiving regional anaesthesia with adductor canal block and IPACK block

Effects of Adductor canal block combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee on pain management compared with epidural analgesia for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty a randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/04/083775
Enrollment
78
Registered
2025-04-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Adductor canal block with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee: 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for adductor canal block and 15ml of 0.25% bupivacaine for IPACK

Sponsors

Armed Forces Medical College Pune
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 to 3 body mass indexes between 18 to 40 kg/m2 fully oriented and cooperative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: refusal to participate any contraindication to neuraxial anaesthesia lower extremity neuropathy local anaesthetic allergy revision surgery advanced liver, heart, kidney failure inability to comprehend VAS score cognitive impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the visual analogue scale VAS of the patients at postoperative 8th hour during passive physical therapy movementsTimepoint: VAS of the patients at postoperative 8th hour during passive physical therapy movements—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to compare VAS score of the patients at 1st postoperative day and 2nd postoperative day during active and passive physical therapy movements 2. to compare 25M ambulation times on POD1 3. to compare opioid consumption in postoperative POD1 and POD2Timepoint: POD 1 and POD 2—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManjot Multani

Armed Forces Medical College Pune

majjohnmk9090@gmail.com9765167438

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026