FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Two Pain Relief Methods After Spine Surgery: ESP Block vs. Local Injections

Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Local Infiltration Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Fixation under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Double BlindTrial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083676
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-03-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Erector Spinae Plane(ESP) Block Group: The patient will receive a USG-guided bilateral ESP block with 15 ml of 0.25% levo-bupivacaine on each side intraoperatively. Control Intervention

Sponsors

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 or 2 level spine fixation surgeries Body mass index (BMI) - 18-30 kg/m2 American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) Grade - I & II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal of consent to participate in study More than 2 level of spine fixation surgery Coagulation disorders(INR more than 1.5) History of hypersensitivity to local or systemic anaesthetic agents Block Failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First rescue analgesiaTimepoint: in postoperative period within 24 hours—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamic parameters, Postoperative pain scores, Functional recovery, Patient satisfaction & PONVTimepoint: At 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 hours post surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSiddharth Goyal

Sir Gangaram Hospital, Delhi

Dr.siddharth.goyal@gmail.com8076128103

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026