Skip to content

The effectiveness of robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy versus standard mirror therapy on motor recovery in upper limb among post- stroke patients

A Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy versus standard mirror therapy on motor recovery in upper limb among post- stroke patients - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083658
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-03-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G939- Disorder of brain, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy: A therapeutic intervention that uses a wearable, soft robotic glove designed to assist individuals with impaired hand function. The glove inc

Sponsors

AIIMS BHOPAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosedstroke by clinical assessment and neuroimaging as defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) Any gender aged between 18 and 70 years Primary stroke,stroke course of less than 6 months Vitally stable patients No cognitive impairment(MMSE score of 24 or above) Sufficient hearing and visual perception Intact skin of the affected upper limb Willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe comorbidites that prevents patients from cooperating with treatment Spasticity of the affected upper limb Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) more than 2 Bone fracture and Joint contracture of affected upper limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effectiveness of robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy (RMT) versus standard mirror therapy (MT) on motor recovery in upper limb among post-stroke patientsTimepoint: after 2 weeks and 4 weeks of intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effectiveness between robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy (RMT) versus standard mirror therapy (MT) on motor recovery in upper limb among post-stroke patientsTimepoint: After 2 weeks and 4 weeks of intervention;To evaluate the improvement in activity of daily living (ADL) among robotic hand glove assisted mirror therapy (RMT) versus standard mirror therapy (MT) group using the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS)Timepoint: After 2 weeks and 4 weeks of intervention

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhiraj M R

AIIMS BHOPAL

puri.pmr@aiimsbhopal.edu.in8249709973

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026