post operative Pain Relief with Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomyin comparision with conventional drug IV Fentanyl

Evaluation of Analgesic efficacy of Errector spinar plane block for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/083648

Enrollment

Registered

2025-03-28

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N398- Other specified disorders of urinary system

Interventions

Intervention1: Errector spinae plane block in PCNL patient: ESPB will be performed under USG guidance .The linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3 cm

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grade I and II 2. Primary unilateral PCNL surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant Patients 1. Patient with deranged coagulation profile 2.Active infection at site of block, systematic infection or allergy to local anaesthetic medication 3. Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To determine the duration of analgesia with erector spinae plane block using VAS ScoreTimepoint: Time of first request of Analgesic 2. Total consumption of rescue Analgesia in 24 hour	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To determine analgesic efficacy of Erector spinae plane block with conventional drugTimepoint: VAS score at 30 min 60 min 2 hour 4 hour 6 hour 12 hour 24 hour	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jyotsna Kubre

Gandhi medical college and associate Hospitals

Vdrtripti@gmail.com9827012052

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026