Skip to content

Efficacy of Saroglitazar in patients with Fatty Liver

Efficacy of Saroglitazar in patients with Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease With Associated Etiology of Steatotic Liver Disease - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083565
Enrollment
88
Registered
2025-03-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K760- Fatty (change of) liver, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: SAROGLITAZAR: SAROGLITAZAR IN PATIENTS WITH MASLD WITH ASSOCIATED ETIOLOGY Intervention2: SAROGLITAZAR: SAROGLITAZAR IN PATIENTS WITH MASLD Intervention3: Saroglitazar: Saroglitazar was

Sponsors

Department of Hepatology Postgraduate institute of medical education and research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with MASLD: defined by the presence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasound or using controlled attenuation parameters (CAP) (of Fibroscan) together with the presence of at least one of five cardiometabolic criteria . 2.Patients of MASLD with moderate amount of alcohol intake (Met ALD) 3.Patients of MASLD with hepatitis C infection 4.Patients of MASLD with HBV infection 5.Patients of MASLD taking one of the steatogenic drugs 6. Patients in all above categories having with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) on VCTE (Fibroscan) of more than 8kPa and less than 13.6 kPa

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients of compensated or decompensated cirrhosis 2. Patients with HCC or any other malignancy 3. Patients already on Vitamin E, Saroglitazar or pioglitazone 4. Pregnancy/Lactation and those non pregnant female patients recruited in the study who will conceive during the study period will be excluded from the study. 5. Patients who are too sick to conduct the protocol. 6. Patients with significant ethanol intake (more than 60 g/ day and 50g/day in males and females respectively)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improvement in hepatic steatosis as evidenced by CAP at 6 months in patients with MASLD with/without associated etiologyTimepoint: Assessment will be done at baseline, 3 months and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of improvement in hepatic steatosis as evidenced by CAP at 6 months in patients with MASLD and MASLD with associated etiology of SLD Improvement in fibrosis as evidenced by LSM, APRI, FIB-4, AGILE-3+, AGILE 4 at 6 months in MASLD with associated etiology Improvement in steatosis as evidenced by MRI PDFF and MRE at 6 months Improvement in steatohepatitis as evidenced by FibroScan-AST score (FAST) and MAST score at 6 months Improvement in hepatic fibrosis at 6 months by non-invasive parameters [Liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Improvement in ALT (in those with baseline elevated ALT)Timepoint: 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSIDDHARTH SHARMA

Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

ajayduseja@yahoo.co.in8168146664

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026