Skip to content

Self-assessment evaluation on student performance for class IV composite restoration in dentistry

Effectiveness of self-assessment on student performance on Class IV Composite resin restorations in Pre-clinical Conservative Dentistry - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083433
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-03-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: SELF ASSESSMENT SCORE BY SCORING GUIDE: PARTICIPATIONS WILL SELF-EVALUATE CLASS 4 COMPOSITE RESTORATION ON TYPODONT TEETH USING SCORING GUIDE IN 3 SEESIONS OVER 1 MONTH Control Interven

Sponsors

Dr Heta Vaghasia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study employs a convenience sampling method. Twelve pre-clinical students (II YEAR BDS batch) are selected based on their availability and willingness to participate. Each student will be evaluated three times for SA and FA scores using 36 typodont teeth. The sample size was determined using G Power 3.1.9.4 software, assuming a 40% improvement after the third exercise, with a 95% confidence interval and 80% power.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students not willing to participate in study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To obtain self-assessment scores(SA) for Class IV composite restoration prepared by students using a scoring guide . 2. Obtain faculty assessment scores (FA) from two faculty members using a scoring guide. 3. Determine the correlation between self-assessment(SA) and faculty-assessment (FA) scores using appropriate statistical analysisTimepoint: To obtain self-assessment scores(SA) for Class IV composite restoration prepared by students using a scoring guide . 2. Obtain faculty assessment scores (FA) from two faculty members using a scoring guide. 3. Determine the correlation between self-assessment(SA) and faculty-assessment (FA) scores using appropriate statistical analysis at 1 week, 2week and 3 week

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
self evaluation would increse confidance among participantsTimepoint: 1 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHeta Vaghasia

Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore

kunda.kamath@manipal.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026