FindTrial
Sign In

Evaluation of ultrasound guided scoring versus manual scoring for difficult spinal anaesthesia

Evaluation of ultrasound examination scoring and manual scoring to predict difficult spinal anaesthesia - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083306
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-03-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Landmark technique: Spinal anaesthesia given via landmark technique in L3-L4 interspinous space and than compare with USG guided techniques Control Intervention2: usg guided tec

Sponsors

Urmila keshari
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with ASA grade I and II Patient with age group 18-60yrs patient who recieve spinal anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient contraindication to spinal anaesthesia patient with back deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in number of passes between two groupsTimepoint: 8weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of needle insertion attempts Time for identifying landmark Level of block Periprocedural pain Score Timepoint: 4weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJaideep Singh

gandhi medical college bhopal

surmila19@gmail.com9826757745

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026