A clinical trial to compare a bent venflon to a regular venflon on basis of certain parameters.

Comparison of Ease of Insertion, Flow and Longevity of Angulated (preformed) Venflon to traditional Venflon in Intravenous Cannulation - A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/083030

Enrollment

100

Registered

2025-03-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Angulated (preformed) venflon: A traditional venflon is compared while use to a venflon bent at an angle of 5 degrees from proximal end in terms of ease of insertion, resulting flow and

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Hospitalised patients needing intravenous cannulation on routine and emergency basis, in perioprative settings and in the Intensive Care Unit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients whose cephalic vein is damaged or inaccessible are not part of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Angulated venflon is easier to secure, require less time,cause less blood spillage without much change to flow or longevity when compared to traditional venflon.Timepoint: 48 hours	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Angulated venflon insertion is less painful to patients & allow faster vascular access, hastening treatment.Timepoint: 48 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Madhusnata Das

Saveetha Medical College and Hospital

drmbashok@rocketmail.com9003026194

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026