FindTrial
Sign In

In paediatric population, 2 types of supraglottic airway devices will be used - Igel and Classic laryngeal airway and their ease of insertion and variation in vitals of the patient will be compared.

A comparative study of ease of insertion and hemodynamic parameters between Supraglottic airway device - Igel and Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway , in paediatric patients A prospective randomized study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/083001
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparative evaluation of ease of insertion and hemodynamic parameters between I-gel and Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway: Patients in group 1 - I-Gel will be used as airway conduit(supral

Sponsors

Christian Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age group 4 months to 6 years , males and females. 2.Patients whose guardians provide us with informed consent. 3.American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II. 4.Scheduled for elective surgical procedures less than one and half hour.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients who are not providing consent. 2.Patients having difficult airway , restricted mouth opening. 3.Patient with risk of aspiration. 4.Patients with upper respiratory tract infection. 5.Patient with bleeding and clotting abnormality. 6.Patient with Oesophageal trauma. 7.Patients with congenital heart disease. 8.Patients with history of upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the ease of insertion , hemodynamic parameters and complications following insertion of I-gel versus Classic Laryngeal mask airway in childrenTimepoint: Immediately after insertion,1 minute, 3 minutes, 5 minutes and 10 minutes after insertion—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the hemodynamic parameters and complications following the removal of I-gel and Classic laryngeal mask airway in childrenTimepoint: Immediately after removal, 5 minutes and 20 minutes after removal—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Elzeba Susan Varghese

Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab

elzebasusan@gmail.com8281430469

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026