Quality of recovery after Hip replacement surgery

Quality of Recovery after Total Hip Replacement: A Randomised Double-Blinded Study Comparing Intrathecal Morphine and Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Block - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/082969

Enrollment

Registered

2025-03-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M160- Bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip Health Condition 2: M16- Osteoarthritis of hip Health Condition 3: M169- Osteoarthritis of hip, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided Sacral erector spinae plane block(ESPB Group): Postoperative USG guided sacral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with30 mL of 0.25% of Bupivacaine in a patient operat

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18-80 years, ASA grade I, III, scheduled for elective primary total hip replacement surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with bleeding disorders Injection site infection Vertebral column anomaly Neurological disorders Refusal to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Quality of recovery using the QoR-15 score .Timepoint: 24 hours after the surgery.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess the post-operative pain measured with NRS (0-10) scoreTimepoint: at 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.;To compare time (in min) to first rescue analgesiaTimepoint: ;Opioid requirement during the postoperative periodTimepoint: 24hr of surgery;Incidence of PONV, Pruritus, Urinary retentionTimepoint: 24 hr.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Alok Kumar Sahoo

AIIMS, Bhubaneswar

alokks108@gmail.com9438884160

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026