Compare tooth caps prepared using a 3D printer and milling machines for the quality of fit and fracture strength.

Clinical evaluation and comparison of 3D printed and milled indirect composite restoration a randomized clinical trial - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/082966

Enrollment

Registered

2025-03-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: CAD/CAM milled crown for post endodontic restoration: patients in intervention will be divided into 2 groups. group 2 getting milled crown as post endodontics restoration. Intervention2

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who required post-endodontic restoration for molar teeth. 2. Presence of healthy natural antagonist tooth. 3.Tooth with at least 3 wall intact.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Periodontally compromised teeth Patient with bruxism

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
We will identify the ideal material and the fabrication process for producing CAD CAM indirect composite restoration that will provide optimum long term functional and esthetic results.Timepoint: 6 month and 12 month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
We will assess the patient satisfaction and durability of the crownTimepoint: 6 month and 12 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPallavi

Yenepoya dental college

drhsarfaraz@gmail.com9845083778

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026