Skip to content

Clinical and Radiological study to compare outcomes of p cage(an implant) placement in the center versus away from the center in patinets undergoing open or endoscopic spine surgery

Clinicoradiological Comparison of Sagittal versus Parasagittal placement of cage in patient undergoing Open or Endoscopic Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery: A Randomized control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/082963
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M511- Thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Parasagittal placement of cage: patients who are diagnosed with certain spine pathology will undergo open or endoscopic Trans foraminal lumbar interbody fusion with parasagittal placeme

Sponsors

AO Spine Asia Pacific
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1-Age more than 18 years 2-Degenerative spondylolisthesis 3-Severe lumbar canal stenosis 4-Recurrent prolapsed intervertebral disc 5-Patients who are willing to follow up for a minimum of 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1-Patient with tandem spinal stenosis 2-Patient with spondylodiscitis 3-Patient with disseminated active infection 4-Pregnant women 5-Patient with traumatic spinal injury, spinal tumor 6-Patient who are unfit to undergo spinal surgery 7-Patient having severe mental insufficiency-like those with Parkinsonism, Alzheimer disease and other neurological disorder. 8-Patient with adult spinal deformity like degenerative scoliosis or coronal imbalance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1-Post operative measurement of Global lumbar lordosis using Plain radiograph 2-Quantitative measurement of subsidence of the cage on NCCT scan 3-Signs of fusion through Modified Lees criteria on NCCT 4-SF 36 score to measure the Functional outcomeTimepoint: 1month,3 month,6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To enlist the complications intraoperative and post operatively such as 1-general anasthesia comlication 2-excessive blood loss 3-infection 4-spinal cord/nerve injury 5-failure of fusion 6-displacement of implanted cage 7-continued lower back painTimepoint: 1 month,3 month,6 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Avinash Kumar

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

dravinashk@aiimspatna.org8789483273

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026