Skip to content

Comparative evaluation of primary stability of implant placed at extraction socket preserved with autogenous dentin graft versus to that in unassisted socket healing

Evaluation of primary stability of implant placed at socket preservation site using autogenous dentin graft and conventional healed socket sites: a comparative clinico-radiographic study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/082891
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 1, Conventionally healed sites: Conventionally healed single tooth edentulous site will be planned for Dental implant placement. Dental implant placement around 6 months after ext

Sponsors

GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY INDORE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: GROUP 1 (1) Patients having a tooth indicated for extraction with adjacent teeth present; in anterior and/or posterior area in any of the jaws, with history of extraction of around 6 months (2) Adequate bone volume to accommodate an implant without the need for bone augmentation. GROUP 2 (1) Tooth indicated for extraction due to trauma, caries, iatrogenic errors, orthodontic reasons COMMON CRITERIA 1) Age:20 to 50 years male /female, systemically healthy 2) Able to understand and sign an informed consent 3) Patient willing for dental implant placement with delayed prothesis. 4) Who will be ready to have their progress followed for at least 9 months. 5) Maintainable oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patient requiring extraction of root canal treated teeth and teeth with periapical pathology. 2) Extraction sites with a partial or complete deficiency of buccal bone plate. 3) If any complication arises during treatment that requires additional soft tissue or hard tissue augmentation for implant placement 4) History of allergy or systemic diseases such as diabetic mellitus, immunocompromising diseases, blood dyscrasias, cardiovascular disease, renal disease etc. 5) Patient with systemic medication like long-term steroids, amino bisphosphonate therapy, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, long term radiation therapy. 6) Presence of active periodontal disease. 7) Smokers and/ or consuming tobacco in any form. 8) Acute infection in the failing tooth. 9) Unwillingness to return for the follow-up examination.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of primary stability of implant placed at socket preservation site using autogenous dentin graft and conventional healed socket sites: a comparative clinico-radiographic studyTimepoint: Evaluation of primary stability of implant 6 months after grafting with autogenous dentin grafted site in group 2 and 6 months after extraction in conventional healed socket sites

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the stability of implant at 3 months post operatively in both groupsTimepoint: 3 months post operatively;To evaluate hard tissue changes around dental implant in both groupsTimepoint: during implant placement and 3 month post operative status

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Madhu S Ratre

Govt. College of Dentistry, Indore

smadhu16feb@yahoo.co.in9406928976

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026