Skip to content

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of Microneedling versus 15% Trichloroacetic acid in Acne scars

A split face comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of Microneedling versus 15 percent Trichloroacetic acid in Acne scars - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/082838
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-03-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L700- Acne vulgaris

Interventions

Intervention1: Microneedling device (Dermaroller) and 15% TCA peel: One half of the face will be randomized to receive Microneedling (Group A) with the coin flip method and the other half will be subj

Sponsors

Pulletikurti Mrudula
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients above 18 years to 45 years of age 2. Patients with grade 2,3 or 4 acne scars symmetrically on both sides of the face according to Goodman and Barons qualitative and quantitative scarring score 3. Patients willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with history of a)active acne b)active infections such as herpes simplex c)known photosensitivity disorders (e.g., SLE, porphyrias) d)bleeding disorders 2. patients who had taken oral retinoids or immunosuppressive drugs in the past 6 months 3. patients who are pregnant or lactating 4. Patients with unrealistic expectations from the outcome of the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. At the end of the fourth session, the results will be graded on the basis of overall acne scar severity score using Goodman and Baron s qualitative and quantitative scarring score and the percentage improvement as follows: i.Grade 0: Less than 25% improvement; ii.Grade 1: 25-49% improvement; iii.Grade 2: 50-74% improvement; iv.Grade 3: More than 75% improvement. 2. Those patients with 1, 2 and 3 grades at the end of sessions will be considered to have improvement clinically. Timepoint: At the end of 12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective assessment will be done by patients on the level of satisfaction with the treatment using the Likert s 5-point scale as very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, unsatisified, very unsatisfied.Timepoint: at the end of 12 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmrita A Hongal

Bangalore medical college and research institute

amritahongalleo@gmail.com9513366639

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026