FindTrial
Sign In

INTERVENTION WITH SUPRAGLOTTIC DEVICE AND OBSERVING OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WHO ARE UNDERGOING LAPROSCOPIC SURGERY

COMPARISON OF AMBU AURAGAIN AND PROSEAL LMA IN ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPROSCOPIC SURGERY - NIL

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/082560
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-03-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: LAPARASCOPIC SURGERIES: General Anesthesia Control Intervention1: LAPARASCOPIC SURGERIES: PROSEAL LMA vs AMBU AURA GAIN Control Intervention2: AMBU AURAGAIN VS PROSEAL LMA: THIS IS A

Sponsors

Dr N DURGA MAHADEV
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients with normal airway MPG 1,2 ASA grade I - III All subjects scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency Surgeries Individuals with known or anticipated Difficult Intubation Patient with ASA = IV Pregnancy with high-risk of aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
SUPRA GLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVIDES offer ease of Insertion , with less post operative complications along with high Oropharyngeal pressureTimepoint: HEMODYNAMICS WILL BE OBSERVED INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVELY BASELINE,1MIN,5MIN,15MIN,20MIN,30MIN,60MIN,120MIN—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
WHICH IS THE BETTER HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE AMBU AURAGAIN OR PROSEAL LMATimepoint: OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE AND CUFF PRESSURE AT 1MIN,5MIN,15MIN,30MIN,60MIN,90MIN,120MIN—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNUKALA DURGA MAHADEV

P.D.U. Government Medical College Rajkot

jagu_jigi@yahoo.com9879570170

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026