Comparison of Different Materials Used for Protecting Exposed Dental Pulp in Permanent Teeth: A Laboratory Study

Comparative evaluation Of different pulp capping agents for direct pulp capping in permanent teeth - A histological ex vivo study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/082391

Enrollment

Registered

2025-03-17

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Kids e putty MTA: A putty-like modification of MTA -It provides a smoother consistency, easier application and reduced setting time compared to conventional MTA.Placed over the exposed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.extraction for orthodontic treatment. 2.Teeth with vital pulp, confirmed using thermal and electric pulp tests. 3.Teeth free from caries, fractures, restorations, periapical pathology, or any developmental anomalies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Teeth with large carious lesions or previous restorations. 2.Presence of pulpal or periapical pathology confirmed radiographically. 3.Non-vital teeth based on clinical tests. 4.Medically compromised patients or those with systemic conditions. 5.History of trauma.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Dentin bridge formationTimepoint: 28 days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
nilTimepoint: nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGanesh Jeevanandan

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital Tamilnadu

helloganz@gmail.com09884293869

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026