Skip to content

Evaluation of manual toothbrush and powered toothbrush

To evaluate the effectiveness of manual toothbrush in comparison with powered toothbrush - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/082262
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-03-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K05- Gingivitis and periodontal diseases

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

VANAPAMALA GNANA KUSUMANJALI
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with age range 25 to 50 years. 2. Good systemic health. 3. Patients who are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with intellectual inability to comprehend and comply with the aims of the study. 2. Mentally disabled patients with compromised hand dexterity 3. Pregnant, Lactating mothers. 4. History of smoking and alcohol abuse. 5. Inability or unwillingness to complete the trial. 6. Patients on any medication that could affect or alter the course of periodontal treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Turesky, Gilmore, Glickman modification of the Quigley- Hein plaque indexTimepoint: Before phase I periodontal therapy and also on 14th day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
clinical attachment levelTimepoint: Before phase I periodontal therapy and also on 14th day

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr P Harish Prabhudev

St. Joseph dental college

devsdental@gmail.com8019907259

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026