Effectiveness of Induction of Labor with Mifepristone and Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Versus Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel alone in Term Pregnancy

Efficacy and Feto Maternal Outcome of Induction of Labor with Mifepristone and Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Versus Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel alone in Term Pregnancy A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/03/082029

Enrollment

220

Registered

2025-03-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O80- Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery

Interventions

Intervention1: drug given in study group T.MIFEPRISTONE 200mg: T.MIFEPRISTONE 200mg per oral once during the study Control Intervention1: placebo in control group T.FERROUS SULPHATE 200mg: T. FERROUS

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: term pregnant females eligible for induction of labour cephalic presentation live fetus reactive non stress test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: not eligible for induction of labour

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
vaginal deliveryTimepoint: initially after induction, 24 hours later later every 6 hours [ maximum of 18 hours]	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
assisted vaginal delivery, ceaserean deliveryTimepoint: initially after induction, after 24 hours later every 6 hours for maximum of 3 times	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Kondapalli Sai Santoshi Prathyusha

Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital & Research Centre - Puducherry

drnirmalajaget@yahoo.com7893786454

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026