FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Repair of Uterine Prolapse

Comparing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Rahman s Technique of Sacrocolpopexy with Vaginal Hysterectomy with Sacrospinous Fixation A Multi-Centric Prospective Cohort Study for Symptomatic Uterovaginal Prolapse. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/081894
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-03-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N812- Incomplete uterovaginal prolapse

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr Hafeez Rahman
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse ( stage 2 and above ) 2)Age from 45 to 70 years will be selected

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus 2)Patients with suspicion of malignancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the anatomical and functional outcome following total laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous fixation in terms of rate of recurrence of vault prolapse.Timepoint: 3 MONTHS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life outcome following total laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous fixation in terms of rate of recurrence of vault prolapse.Timepoint: 3 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sonia Farhan

Sunrise Institute of Medical Sciences Pvt. Ltd.

soniafarhanph@gmail.com9645349136

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026