Skip to content

Comparing Two Techniques for Removal of Severely Decayed Upper Third Molar Teeth.

Traditional Buccal Elevation Technique vs Palatal Elevation Technique (PET) for Intra-alveolar Extraction of Grossly Decayed Maxillary Third Molars: A Comparative Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/03/081760
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-03-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Palatal elevation technique: Newly introduced technique for extraction of grossly decayed maxillary third molars. the elevator in this technique is engaged palatally and luxation is car

Sponsors

Dr.N.T.R University of Health Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients within the age range of 18-60 years. 2.Patients with at least one grossly decayed maxillary third molar indicated for extraction. 3.Patients with no relevant medical history that contraindicates tooth extraction. 4.Patients with adequate inter incisal opening. 5. Patients with thick and inextensible cheeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients whose mouth opening is severely restricted with underlying conditions like oral submucous fibrosis, myofacial pain dysfunction syndrome, internal derangement of TMJ, myositis of masticatory muscles. 2.Patients taking medications affecting bone remodelling process (i.e. bisphosphonates) 3.Patients with buccally tipped maxillary third molars.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The novel palatal elevation technique would be an effective alternative for buccal elevation technique for extraction of grossly decayed maxillary third molars in terms of swiftness and intraoperative complication rate is less with PET when compared to traditional buccal elevation technique.Timepoint: No time point

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The post-operative complication rate would be less with PET compared to traditional buccal elevation techniqueTimepoint: At the end of 7 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKavila Vivek Manohar

GITAM Dental College and Hospital

vkavila@gitam.edu8179803202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026